Philippine president signs new laws

8/11/2024 13:59

        Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr signed two laws on Friday aimed at strengthening the country's maritime claims and bolstering its territorial integrity, as tensions with China over disputed areas in the South China Sea persist. The Maritime Zones Act and the Archipelagic Sea Lanes Act would define the Philippines' maritime entitlements and set designated sea lanes and air routes to reinforce sovereignty and maritime rights under international law. Marcos hailed the laws as a demonstration of the Philippines' commitment to uphold an international rules-based order, and protect its rights to exploit resources peacefully in its exclusive economic zone (EEZ). "Our people, especially our fisher folk, should be able to pursue their livelihood free from uncertainty and harassment," Marcos said. "We must be able to harness mineral and energy resources in our sea bed." While the two laws were envisioned to help U.S. ally the Philippines to monitor and defend agains
        t potential encroachment, questions remain about how they will be enforced and if they will impact Chinese activity in the Philippine EEZ. China asserts its claim of sovereignty over almost the entire South China Sea through an armada of coast guard ships, some of which are accused by its neighbours of aggressive conduct and of trying to disrupt energy and fisheries activity in their EEZs. Senator Francis Tolentino, one of the authors of the maritime zones measure, said he does not expect tensions in Philippine EEZ will be instantly reduced with the implementation of the new laws. "China will not recognise these, but the imprimatur that we'll be getting from the international community would strengthen our position," Tolentino told a press conference. China's embassy in Manila did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the new laws and senator's remarks. Tolentino also said the laws would reinforce a 2016 arbitration ruling on the South China Sea, which dec
        lared China's expansive claims had no basis under international law. China has rejected the 2016 decision.